Directed by Jack Arnold; produced by Jack Arnold and Howard
Christie
The residents of a prosperous western town are startled by the
arrival of John Gant (Audie Murphy). Gant is a hired killer who shoots down men
for the money paid to him by his victims’ enemies. Refusing to fight won’t save
a man, as Gant has a knack of galling a victim into drawing a weapon first,
then successfully claiming self-defence. Now, everyone is wondering for whom
Gant has come, and who hired him. Soon, the townspeople find that their worst
enemy isn’t Gant, it’s their own guilty consciences.
Probably the best of Murphy’s movies, No Name on the Bullet is as much a psychological drama with a
western setting as a straight western. There is gun-play, but the real action
is in the attitudes of the supporting characters.
Gant is like the Angel of Death; no one knows whom he will touch,
and everyone starts searching their past, trying to determine who would want
them dead. Those with clean consciences, such as the local doctor and his
father, the blacksmith (played by Charles Drake and R.G. Armstrong,
respectively, even though they were the same age) are worried only about the
effects of Gant on the town.
Though the identity of Gant’s next victim will probably be no
mystery to many viewers, there is nonetheless tension throughout the movie, as
the townsfolk look askance at each other, and the doctor tries to talk Gant out
of his mission and simultaneously to understand the young killer. The writing
is very good in this respect, but also in terms of individual scenes.
There is a strong philosophical flavour to the dialogue, whether
indirectly, in what the townspeople argue about, or directly, in the
conversations between the doctor and Gant. There is a scene in which the two of
them play chess, an intriguing variation of the scene between the knight and
Death in The Seventh Seal, released
two years before.
The acting is very good as well, especially on the part of Murphy,
who plays a very restrained character, unnaturally calm, someone who knows well
how people will act and react, perhaps because he has seen so many in extremis.
He knows that he can defeat or face down any individual, and knows that a mob,
threatened as individuals, won’t have the courage to do anything. He is also a
content man, having no remorse for what he does, whether because he is truly
amoral or because he is truly moral - though his morals would not be shared by the
majority.
The direction is good, as well. Arnold is known more these days
for his work in the science fiction genre (eg. The Creature from the Black Lagoon, The Incredible Shrinking Man) of the 1950s, though he eventually
went to work almost exclusively in television. It is less the pace or blocking
of scenes that provides the tension as the mannerisms and attitudes of the
characters, more typical of psychological films than westerns.
No Name on the Bullet is a western that viewers who don’t care for westerns might like, a thoughtful examination of what impending death - or, rather, impending punishment - does to people, and whether or not they deserve what results.
My impression is that this movie was largely ignored at the time it was first released, but its reputation has greatly improved over the years.
ReplyDelete