Directed by Curtis Hanson; produced by Curtis Hanson, Arnon
Milchan and Michael Nathanson
In early 1950s Los Angeles, three policemen - ruthlessly ambitious
Edmund Exley (Guy Pearce), celebrity Jack Vincennes (Kevin Spacey) and
muscleman Bud White (Russell Crowe) - become involved in separate
investigations that aren’t what they seem. As the men delve further, they
realise that their cases may all be tied to the city’s drug-trade, left up for
grabs by an underworld power-vacuum. The trio reluctantly work together -
overseen by the enigmatic Captain Dudley Smith (James Cromwell) - as they
discover secrets in their city, and within themselves.
An excellent neo-noir film, L.A.
Confidential puts a complex plot and detailed characters into a convincing
setting, with superb results. The first element one notices is the casting and
the acting. The three leads are thoroughly convincing. (I’d read that Pearce
initially showed up for his audition wearing longish hair and casual clothes;
he returned after a mediocre reading with his hair cut short, wearing glasses
and a suit. Everyone then knew he was Exley.)
The performances cannot be improved upon, especially Spacey’s and
Pearce’s, while it was vital that Cromwell’s, though less front and centre, be spot-on,
as he needs to show certain sides to his character that only eventually come to
light. Crowe’s acting is quieter, as befits his character, which makes his
bursts of violence more startling. Kim Basinger has a significant rĂ´le, and
does well with it.
Mention must also be made of the supporting actors, even the bit
players. They seem to have been chosen as much for their physiques as anything
else. Many of the detectives are middle-aged and paunchy, giving the impression
of men who, having secured their coveted positions, now have tenure, and
nothing short of a publicly committed crime will evict them. The police force
is made to look a closed shop, a caste, with all that implies.
The writing is very good. The screenplay was co-written by the
director and Brian Helgeland, from James Ellroy’s novel. The dialogue is not so
necessary for its words, as for what the words convey. There are numerous fine
scenes, especially those when each of the three lead characters discuss the
reasons they became policemen, and realise how far they have strayed from their
original intents; Spacey’s moment in this regard is particularly memorable.
There is a large dollop of irony spread through the story, as the
characters confront the consequences of their actions, or inactions, each having
done something they intensely regret, and then try to make good. How Bud
White’s violent nature betrays him, and how Exley determines that justice is
better than his career are good examples. Also, notable is the way the trio
start to work together, despite disliking each other, gaining respect for each
other and themselves as they go. And for irony - coming with particularly bad
timing for one character - one can’t beat the way Exley finally answers the
questions Smith asks him at the film’s start.
There is verisimilitude in the writing, as well. All the cops
appear either to know each other, at least in passing, or of each other. This
reinforces the feeling, mentioned above, that the police department is a
relatively small club.
The direction is the least conspicuous aspect of the movie, I
think, though, like all good direction, is indispensable. This is probably
Hanson’s best work, though Wonder Boys,
his follow-up film, comes close. He creates wonderfully tense scenes, some
involving confrontation with and without violence, and the climax is exciting,
and gives no clue as to how it will end. (Hanson’s writing work includes the
excellent The Silent Partner,
reviewed on this blog in September, 2019; Never
Cry Wolf, and the widely-misinterpreted White
Dog.)
For its story, its writing, its acting, its direction, and its themes of corruption, comradeship and redemption, L.A. Confidential is one of my favourite movies.
Thanks for another one I can get at the Library.. I did find and watch the one with Bogart and Bacall recently. And I had watched the Gene Autry one a while back.
ReplyDeleteI saw that movie when it first came out. Film noir isn't usually my cup of tea, but this one was quite good. And as a long-time resident of Los Angeles, it's always fun for me to see it portrayed on film.
ReplyDeleteI thought this was a re make of a B/W feature....it's not, and now
ReplyDeleteI'm wondering what movie I saw, that reminded me of this one's
title ....I will think of it in probably 2 years.....then I can let you know !
I think the word 'confidential' was put in the title of several films noir. The one that comes to mind right away is "Kansas City Confidential".
DeleteYour comment that the police department is a small club is apt. My brother, a former police officer, could tell stories of the closed nature of the city department he was part of for over 20 years.
ReplyDeleteThe movie does sound interesting and the lead actors are some I actually know of - with my limited knowledge of films and movies, that's saying something.