Directed and produced by Robert Aldrich
A Hollywood actor (Jack Palance) has reached a crisis in his career. At the height of his popularity, he has sacrificed his professional integrity for fame and fortune, and now wants out. His wife (Ida Lupino) supports this decision, and will leave him if he doesn’t quit. His powerful studio boss (Rod Steiger) is pressuring him to sign a new contract, and will ruin him if he refuses. Will he stand up to one, or both, or will he crack under the strain?
This very rare example of Palance in a leading role shows both that he was competent, and that he was probably best in a supporting role. He gives a creditable performance, and is really the best thing in an otherwise sorry melodrama. It is based on a play by Clifford Odets and, despite Odets being one of the most prominent American playwrights of the twentieth century, reminded me of a university or high school work.
The script is filled with improbable lines and dialogue that would be found only on the stage. Almost every line could be spoken with half as many words and twice as much clarity. The characters were well-defined but without much subtlety.
The direction picks up where the script leaves off, and simply magnifies its problems. The comparison to a high school production becomes stronger, with yelling and crying taking the place of acting. Histrionics vie with overdone earnestness. Considering the fame and skill of the director, the placement and blocking of the actors is amateurish, Palance more than once facing away from the camera or even behind lampshades while talking.
As stated above, Palance did well, though he was badly miscast as a matinĂ©e idol. (John Garfield had filled the role during the play’s Broadway run, and would have been more credible.) The other actors are adequate in their roles, with the exception of Steiger, who gives an early example of the extreme over-acting for which he became infamous. It was like watching William Shatner on steroids. Everett Sloane, as Palance’s agent, was, in his own way, as hammy as Steiger. Lupino reacted rather than acted, though Wendell Corey, as Steiger’s henchman, did a good job.
The problem with The Big Knife stems, I think, from it being too personal. It appears, given Odets’s past, to be autobiographical in some ways. Odets had been a darling of the New York theatre crowd, the new talent, but had gone to Hollywood to write movie scripts. He imagined that he had sold out; Palance represented him in the film. Steiger was the studio boss for whom Odets worked, likely Louis B Mayer. Lupino was the wife who was almost Odets’s agent in dealings with the studio. The manifest emotions of the play may have been how Odets saw his relationship with Hollywood, or how he would have wanted it to be. He may have been too close to the subject to write a convincing, realistic depiction of the situation, and instead created a nightmarish interpretation.
Whether or not this view is accurate, The Big Knife is at different moments tiresome, annoying and unbelievable, but always unsatisfying.
Also, the "artistic integrity" struggles of a rich, famous actor doesn't exactly strike me as promising material for high drama.
ReplyDeleteI mean to say, we should all have such troubles.
"It was like watching William Shatner on steroids." 'Nuff said!
ReplyDeleteWell..I for one am a bit fan..as l am of ALL the
ReplyDeleteold b/w stars and films..the likes of Bogart, Cagney,
Russell etc..They ALL stood out, far more than some
of the so called actors of to~day..Like Clooney..! :(
"Nuff Said"..
Jack Palance.. He was born Volodymyr Palahniuk,
100 years ago, on 18 February 1919, the son of
Ukrainian immigrants who’d settled in Pennsylvania...
And..was a boxer in his early days..he was also a singer!
But he was a man, who had charisma, and charm, one
of those people..who walked into a room..and you knew
they were there..
One of his best was Shane..1953..nominated for an Oscar..
Nominated for two Oscars..but never ever won one..!
One of my all time favourites is still..
'I Died a Thousand Times' Brilliant film..!
It's a pity we don't have his like to~day, most
of the so called film stars are just 'plastic'
and technology is being used more and more..they'll
be making films without actors soon..seemed to think
one or two have already been made...Shame! :(.
I can understand why Palance changed his name... As for "Shane", that's one I should see again. The final shoot-out lasts only a few seconds but is one of the most tense and exciting moments in western movies.
Delete