Directed
by Daryl Duke; produced by Joel B Michaels and Stephen Young
A
nondescript bank teller (Elliott Gould) accidentally learns that his bank is
going to be robbed and, later, by whom. Anticipating the crime, he steals
$50,000 from the bank himself and, when the robber (Christopher Plummer) makes
his move, surrenders only a pittance. Though he thinks he has gotten away with
his action, the banker is soon faced with the murderous robber, a sadist who
will stop at nothing to retrieve what he thinks he should have had in the first
place.
In
the 1970s, the Canadian film industry was still very small. It had great
potential, but any actor who wanted to expand their career, actors such as
Plummer, and Donald Sutherland, had to work in Britain or the United States (or
France, if they were from Quebec) to do so – though they often continued to
remain professionally true to their homeland, as well. To someone such as
myself, though a youngster at the time, Canadian movies seemed made for art rather
than for entertainment. While laudable, this thinking guaranteed a very limited
audience and a thin future.
The Silent Partner
was very different. On a par with some of the best bank-robbery films, its
story is original, its characters three dimensional and its direction sharp.
Gould gives an excellent performance as a likeable man who sees his one chance
“to start over”, and takes it, finding then that the consequences are far
different than what he had expected. Unusually, his character develops noticeably
and realistically during the story. While this may, in less capable scripts,
have been ascribed simply to having sudden wealth ($50,000 was a lot more in
1978 than it is now), Gould’s personality realises its potential seemingly
through the ordeal of having to outwit, if he can, the not unintelligent – and
limitlessly ruthless – Plummer. He finds his strength as he goes along.
Plummer,
for his part, is not just a generic crazy criminal. He brings true menace to
his character. He doesn’t kill whenever he feels like it; he knows he cannot
get away with everything. His temper is explosive, but he is cunning, and has
patience; he even admires what he sees as similar qualities in Gould. His is a
believable creation, and thus frightening.
The
supporting characters, Susannah York and CĂ©line Lomez as women who become a
part of the drama, are strong, too, though with less opportunity to show it.
They grow as well, thanks to Gould’s predicament, though their growth is not
always beneficial to them.
The
script is smart and the direction produces true tension, notably in a
confrontation conducted by telephone, a brutal fight in Gould’s
apartment, and the climax, the end of which most viewers likely will not
expect.
While
nudity and expletives give The Silent
Partner a 1970s gloss, the movie could have come straight from the golden
age of film noir, and, in black and white, had perhaps Dana Andrews in the lead,
and a villain a la Richard Widmark, in Kiss
of Death. The Silent Partner deserves
to be ranked with some of the best of the genre.
When I went to work in a bank in 1982, I remember being told about a bank teller (as they were called then) who was found to have $20,000 in his wastebasket. The auditors had come in and done a count of the cash in the branch and came up short. He admitted to tucking it away in case the branch was ever robbed - he felt he'd be owed that for the distress. I don't know if it was true, or if it was a story based on this movie. Who knows, but I never tried it.
ReplyDelete“Owed that for the distress”; I’d be interested to know how he arrived at the amount of $20,000, and whether he felt that everyone would deserve a similar sum in case of robbery. The thinking of some people…
Delete