Directed by Pekka Parikka; produced
by Marko Röhr
It’s 1939, the Soviet Union has attacked Finland, and the latter’s population mobilises to fight the invader.
The men of Kauhava leave to join their regiment at the front, where they are
attacked by infantry, bombed by airplanes, assaulted by tanks and pounded by
artillery, against none of which they have adequate numbers or defences. Even
so, they fight for their country or die trying.
The Winter War, though largely
unknown around the globe, had a profound effect on Finland. With Europe
preoccupied with the newly begun Second World War, the USSR hoped a swift and
easy campaign would grant them strategic districts along their northwestern
border, and turn Finland into a vassal state. But Moscow had not counted on the
tenacity of their enemy; one in ten Finns served in uniform, and even the
Finnish Communist Party put country ahead of ideology and fought the Russians.
Further, the Red Army had been emasculated by Stalin’s purges, fifty per cent
of the officer corps - and ninety per cent of its generals - being executed or
sent to prison camps. Led by ignorance and riven by inefficiency, the Soviets
suffered a third of a million casualties, half of them deaths. The Finns were
eventually overwhelmed by numbers but such was the hammering they gave their
opponents that Moscow didn’t try to occupy the country, though the terms of the
peace treaty were onerous. But Finland remained free, and is to this day.
So much for the history lesson; what
about the movie? At three and a quarter hours (the film covers the conflict
from start to finish), one might think that it would drag; it doesn’t. The
story concerns itself almost completely with the soldiers while they are at the
front, though there are scenes of one (Konsta Mäkelä) going on leave, and of
the regiment being moved to another location. This film is about ordinary
infantry; there are no special operations, no elite units, so their combat is
repetitive to them. For the viewer, however, the director and writer show a
different aspect of combat, a different danger, a different response, each
time, so the soldiers’ tedious and deadly routine becomes various for us.
The script, by Antti Tuuri, from his
own novel, provides sparse dialogue, most of it dealing with battle situations.
Much must be inferred, such as the Russians’ vast superiority in equipment
being denoted by a Finnish joke, rather than a bald statistic, or by the need
to rob Red Army dead not of money or watches, but of ammunition and machine
guns. The relationships between the men are stoic, as are those between parents
and children, and even between husbands and wives - when the main character
(Taneli Mäkelä) leaves for war, he shakes his spouse’s hand, rather than kisses
her; perhaps indicative of Finns, or of Finns in 1939. The stereotypes often
found in war movies are largely avoided; you won’t find the band of misfits
usually seen in Hollywood combat.
The acting is quiet, maybe
reflecting Finnish character; fatalism is common. The performers are
convincing, especially in portraying ordinary men, big and small, fit and fat,
bespectacled and bookish, as civilians turned warriors. There are no false
heroics, simply men doing what they must, almost every action being concluded
without comment or praise. All the actors are credible.
Interest may be discovered in
depictions of Finnish culture of the time. Electricity is common in Finnish
homes, and rural communities live in clean and prosperous houses. An aspect of
many war movies missing from Talvisota is scenes of training. Between
the world wars, many European countries had compulsory service, whereby large
numbers of men were basically-trained, then released back into civilian life,
creating a huge pool of ready soldiers for emergencies. Finland does this
still.
The end of this engrossing film
comes suddenly, perhaps too suddenly for the viewer, but wars often end
abruptly for the soldier, who is out of touch with everything but his own fight
for survival. The viewer feels that he has been through a great deal with
these men yet, ironically, will not feel bored or drained. Realistic and
exciting, interesting and involving, Talvisota eschews the speechifying
of Saving Private Ryan, and the almost sanitised symbolism of the recent
Dunkirk. If you have a free day, and wish to know a melancholy slice of
real history, see Talvisota.
It sounds more like a documentary than an "entertainment" film, which I appreciate in historical movies. I'll see if I can hunt this one down.
ReplyDeleteIt's definitely a drama, but with more than a touch of those wonderful British films of the 1940s and '50s with their meticulous research and accuracy.
DeleteMy Latvian grandfather performed similar military service when the Soviets threatened to invade the country, but obviously it didn’t work out as well as it did for the Finns.
DeleteInteresting - and tragic. The smaller Baltic countries didn't have either the population or the geographic advantages of Finland, unfortunately. I have a book called "British Agent", by John Whitwell (a pseudonym), who was SIS head of station in Riga in 1940. It makes for sad reading.
DeleteIt definitely sounds interesting, and your comment that Finland continues to train its young people makes sense, considering the size of the country and proximity to Russia. Especially these days!
ReplyDeleteFrom what I've read, peacetime conscription is still supported by a huge majority of Finns.
Delete