Directed by Jules Dassin; produced by René Bezard, Henri Bérard,
Pierre Cabaud
Tony le Stéphanois (Jean Servais) has just been released from
prison, after a five-year term for jewel thievery. He’s reluctant to start any
fresh caper, even with his good and trusted allies Jo le Suédois (Carl Möhner)
and Mario Ferrati (Robert Manuel). But after a confrontation with his former
girlfriend, Mado (Marie Sabouret), who took up with another man the week after
Tony’s sentencing, he counts himself in. But the simple smash-and-grab Jo and
Mario envisioned isn’t enough: instead of a few gems from a shop-front window,
the three associates determine to rob the safe inside. But though they may get away
with the jewels, their troubles will only be starting.
Even as a drama, Rififi
is an excellent film, with well-defined characters, well-written dialogue,
excellent performances and direction that brings it all together. The men and
women who populate the movie are realistic, their actions and reactions are
realistic. The underworld depicted is not a deep study of the power-politics
behind organised crime, but a slice of the lives of a small group of crooks,
men and women who live by theft, assault and blackmail. Nonetheless, the four
main characters come across as sympathetic, largely due to their loyalty to one
another.
Servais is the lynchpin of the cast, as he makes Tony a tired, middle-aged
hood, seemingly ready to get out of the life in which he’s always lived, but
unable to resist a good caper. This type of character may be common in
crime-films, but when it’s done well, it’s always fresh. Jo and Mario are
happier men, each with his family life (Jo’s young child is Tony’s godson), and
there is interest in seeing criminals (whose activities are, after all, largely
part-time work) enjoying the bosom and joys of home. A contrast to this is
Tony, whose prison stretch excludes him from such bliss. In each case, the
actor creates a convincing portrait.
The dialogue doesn’t delve into the personalities of the
characters much; these come out in their actions. Spoken words stick very
closely to carrying the plot, except at the beginning, as when we learn that
Tony’s five years in jail spared Jo any prison-time. Aside from such
introductions, we must glean what we can from what we see done.
The direction by Dassin, who also excellently plays (under the
pseudonym Perlo Vita) Cesar the safe-breaker, is top-notch. One would expect no
less from the director of Brute Force,
Night and the City and The Naked City. Special attention must
have been given to the extras involved; their faces and attitudes go a great
way to creating atmosphere.
And on the subject of atmosphere, Dassin’s use of locations is
well-conceived, showing a slight distortion of the Paris that many might
expect: there is the unmistakable architecture, the broad boulevards, the cafés
– but mostly in a type of gloom that isn’t just the result of black-and-white
photography. It’s no coincidence that many of the scenes are wet with rain,
dark with night or dim with clouds. Despite Jo’s glad home-life and Mario’s
hilarity, the world these people inhabit is more in keeping with Tony’s frowning
and slightly tubercular grimness.
The centre-piece of Rififi
is the heist itself. Like many aspects of the movie, it is treated radically
different than the novel that inspired the film. The scene runs more than half
an hour and is without music or words. Yet it neither drags nor loses interest:
half the time the viewer is wondering why the crooks are doing something – we
are not privy to their detailed plan, after all – but moments later, we are
enlightened. The scene is as instructional as it is entertaining.
Though the heist is what most talk about when discussing Rififi, there is an equally exciting scene at the end, when Tony races to return his godson to his home. What is astonishing about this sequence – also almost without dialogue – is that there is no question how it will end, yet it remains tense until its final seconds.
Rififi is a drama and a caper-film, film noir and character study, fashioned by a master movie-maker and presented by a first-rate cast and crew.
My immediate reaction was Tony didn't learn his lesson. But I suppose that is too simplistic (and this is a story after all). In real life, it would be difficult to change one's life so drastically and much easier to find one's way back to prior friends and lifestyle.
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like a good movie, though I'd probably look for the book. :)
It may be a rare instance of a film adaptation being better than the book. Truffaut wrote that the source material was the worst crime novel he'd read, and the movie the best crime film he'd seen.
DeleteApparently, the heist scene was so well done, it got the movie banned in some countries, on the grounds that it was a tutorial on how to commit burglary!
ReplyDeleteThat's interesting, since, as I wrote, the details of the robbery aren't laid out, just the actions. I imagine crooks may have 'retrofitted' the plans to the results.
DeleteSure this was a good film. I didnt Saw It yet. Perhaps one day gives reposition in TV.
ReplyDelete