Directed by Abraham Polonsky;
produced by Bob Roberts
Lawyer Joe Morse (John Garfield) has
big plans for the coming week: he and his client (Roy Roberts), an important
man in the numbers racket, have fixed the coming draw, in order to break a
swarm of small operations and then move in and take them over. In the meantime,
they hope to persuade the government to legalise the numbers game and turn it
into a lottery, which Morse and his boss would already run. But Morse comes up
against three obstacles: his brother (Thomas Gomez), who runs one of the little
operations, a new girlfriend (Beatrice Pearson), and a reforming commission,
intent on crushing the numbers racket. It’s going to be a tough week for Joe
Morse.
I was disappointed in Force of Evil. It is a classic of
American cinema, especially in the crime genre. Certainly, it has its
advantages, foremost being the leading man. Garfield is excellent, his
understated acting perfect for a character who hopes things will go smoothly
but knows he is on the edge of an abyss every moment of his life. His bravado
is clearly too cool, his confidence too superficial; he waits for the click on
the telephone line signifying a wire-tap, balances strategies like a juggler.
All the time, there is an innocence to his character suggesting that, despite
his experience and knowledge, he can’t understand why people don’t do as he
does, think as he does.
The problems with the film, however,
are multiple. The female lead, though adequate, seems to have been chosen more
for her dewy-eyed expressions of incredulity than for her acting abilities, and
I never found Garfield’s attraction to her credible. It might have been due to
a mere desire for romantic conquest, but if so, Garfield’s choice comes across
as entirely random.
Indeed, this issue highlights a
larger problem: that the actors are let down more by the script than by their
skills. Gomez’s anxiety borders on hysteria much of the time, no doubt
intending to reflect his constant imminent heart attack; Howland Chamberlain
plays a small-time accountant whose betrayal seems thinly motivated at first,
then non-existent. Marie Windsor puts in an appearance as Roberts’s wife and
has two scenes, neither of them necessary; her considerable talent is wasted
here. As well, the supporting players are in a melodrama, while Garfield
retains control in a purely dramatic manner.
Even his character undergoes a transformation which the script thinks is
deeper than does the viewer. We see him with no sympathy at all for the
millions of people who play the numbers. He thinks only of himself and his
brother, with the later, unaccountable, addition of his girlfriend. By the
film’s end, though, we are asked to believe in his metamorphosis into an almost
heroic figure. Many works of fiction achieve this. Force of Evil does not.
While the script abets the
overwrought performances, the story appears to have been pared down from
something that made more sense. The numbers racket is well-explained, as is the
intended take-over by Garfield and Roberts of the small ‘banks’ - the people
who take in gamblers’ money. After that, there comes the desire of a rival
(Paul Fix) to meet with Gomez, presumably to do a deal; there is a kidnapping,
which seems pointless; another meeting between Roberts and Fix, which should
have negated the earlier meeting… It’s possible that I missed something; if so,
I must have missed a lot.
There is one aspect that, while it
could not have saved Force of Evil,
could be used for an interesting premise of its own. Looming over all the
villains is the shadow of the unseen crime-fighter, Hall, who wants to smash
the rackets and clean up the city. Unlike many similar stories, this movie’s
villains treat Hall with respect, almost reverentially, an avenging angel
against whom they have little recourse; thus, the rush to legalise their
felonies. It made me think a version of the Sherlock Holmes stories, from the
point of view of the Moriarty gang, with the omnipresent and frightening
detective in the background, might prove entertaining.
Unfortunately, Force of Evil is neither as imaginative nor as gripping as it might
have been. No one in it really deserves salvation, and the tragedies that
befall the main characters seem, if more than they should have suffered, not
out of keeping with their actions. Sometimes a classic film leaves me wondering
what the fuss is about. I wonder that about Force
of Evil.
I've never seen this movie, although I've heard of it. Interestingly, it got mixed reviews when it was first released. I wonder when it began to be regarded as a classic?
ReplyDelete