Directed
by John Sherwood; produced by Howard Christie
A
meteorite crashes into the deserts of southern California, shattering into
hundreds of pieces. What are seen by a geologist (Phil Harvey) and a little
girl (Linda Scheley) as curiosities begin to grow when in contact with water,
and soon, life and property are menaced by toppling towers of stone. It’s up to
another scientist (Grant Williams) and his fellow townspeople to stop what
seems to be unstoppable.
The
late 1940s and the ‘50s were the golden age of science fiction cinema, when the
genre made the leap from books to film. Like its printed counterpart, the
science fiction movie was often cheap, poorly made and, literally, ridiculous.
Bad science fiction tends to overshadow much that was good; indeed, the latter
is often lumped with the former simply because it might be low-budget and from
the 1950s. But The Monolith Monsters is
an example of quality overcoming limitations.
The Monolith Monsters
certainly isn’t very good – it doesn’t
approach The Thing from Another World
(reviewed on this blog in 2017) – but it is good, nonetheless. The premise is
original: there is no alien race intent on conquest, no sentient life with
which to reason, no advanced technology. There is instead a very puzzling
scientific problem: how to stop something that, when it combines with a
plentiful and, indeed, indispensible element of human existence, becomes relentless.
The solution is, in fact, arbitrary, in which case the problem then cleverly
switches to its application. The science, as in most such films, would be
dubious in the real world, but within the context of the story remains
legitimate.
The
script is intelligence enough not to be insulting to the viewer. The characters
use their brains sufficiently and their egos not much at all. The Monolith Monsters is gratifyingly
free of the stupid characters that populate too many movies and who are
included, apparently, just to add contrived crises. There are a few holes in
the script, though they are more like ‘slips’: for instance, touching the
extraterrestrial rock evidently results in an organism’s petrifaction, even
though several characters touch the objects without harm. Judging by events, I
assumed that touching the wet rock
led to the fatal result, though this point is not made in the film.
While
The Monolith Monsters uses a number of
genre clichés, such as the isolated community in danger, it mitigates some. For
example, though the town in question (population 1,500) is set apart, its
residents are quick to utilise the greater resources found farther away.
Another
amateur reviewer mentioned that the townspeople in the film are too compliant;
I presume he referred to the lack of resistance to evacuating the community,
and to the coöperation among the characters. The latter aspect caused me no
disturbance. Sometimes people do work well together. As for residents willingly
fleeing their town in the face of disaster, one must recall that this movie was
made in 1957: moving quickly and without question when told was practiced in
the shadow of the mushroom cloud.
The
acting is competent. Williams is best known for being the title character in The Incredible Shrinking Man, also
released in 1957, and another science fiction film with no villain. He does
well as someone who could be the handsome leading man but nonetheless must be
the ordinary person caught in extraordinary circumstances. The female lead
(Lola Albright) is unremarkable, but the other supporting players are natural
and effective. William Schallert appears uncredited as a weatherman who doesn’t
do well in emergencies, and Troy Donahue, a couple of years away from his time
as a heart-throb, has a bit part as a demolitions-man.
Something
I didn’t expect was the quality of the direction. There is a strong element of
tension, especially in the first twenty minutes or so, and this is helped by
use of foreshadowing, such as the sight of a dam or the sound of thunder. When
the audience knows the secret for which the protagonists are searching, and the
director uses this knowledge well, suspense can be created. It helps when the
protagonists aren’t missing the clues through mental density.
Though
The Monolith Monsters is not even
among the best science fiction films of its decade, it is nonetheless an
entertaining movie which does what every successful picture does: it uses what
it has to the greatest advantage.
I'm surprised I haven't heard of this movie; the concept is certainly more original than the usual monster movie of the period.
ReplyDeleteI've never enjoyed sci-fi movies because they usually have some aliens doing horrendous things to the earthly inhabitants. This sounds a lot more interesting.
ReplyDeletenow I'm wondering in my ever forgetful frame of mind if I have this DVD; because I thought I had every movie from this time frame on such.... I saw Phantom of the Opera this weekend; first time ever watched; directed by hammer films; great flick; sad ending :( ♥♥♥
ReplyDeleteThat'd be the 1962 version of "The Phantom of the Opera", with Herbert Nom in the title role. I read once that Cary Grant was considered and/or interested in the lead in this film.
DeleteI love sci fi movies from the 50s. The schlockier the better! Here in the U.S. we have a Sci/Fi Horror movie host that goes by the name Svengoolie. Every Saturday night he shows an old horror (the original Wolfman or Dracula type) or Sci Fi, like Monolith Monsters. I loved it!
ReplyDeleteI think science fiction movies lend themselves to ridicule sometimes because they often depend on convincing effects, and if the effects aren't convincing, well... But in some cases, inexpensive doesn't mean bad.
DeleteThis movie takes me back to being a kid, and watching horror/scary films on Saturday afternoons. This movie has always stuck in my head; people turned to stone. Great stuff!
ReplyDeleteI cant believe it! I remembered this one not from its title but from the story line. Yes there is something memorable about growing crystals? or whatever that seem unstoppable. I liked this one. Ahh, I remember well Saturdays at the matinee watching great scary (mostly not) movies. 2 in the early years with a cartoon or two in the middle. I think it was better than You Tube or anything today. Had to be as there were comic books after for 10 or 15 cents each!
ReplyDelete