Followers

Friday, July 19, 2019

Tremors (1990)


Directed by Ron Underwood; produced by Brent Maddock and S. S. Wilson


In the desert community of Perfection, Earl and Valentine (Fred Ward, Kevin Bacon) are two friends with an amiable but ephemeral existence as handymen. Tired of hauling garbage and pounding fence-posts for a bare living, they determine to re-locate to the near by town of Bixby where, apparently, prospects for two enterprising businessmen are much better. That’s when they make the startling discovery that they and their fellow villagers are under attack by huge, carnivorous monsters that can drill through soil as a fish swims through water. As Earl observes, they decided to leave Perfection one day too late.


Tremors has almost everything going for it, and it would be difficult to pick one element that contributes more to its success than another. For one, the writing is superior. A bane of watching a monster movie is the stupid character, the man or woman who is included either to provide an easy victim or to propel the story by doing something nobody would really do, but which is needed by lazy writers to get from one point to another in the tale. While some of Tremors’ characters are annoying, and others not particularly bright, none is artificially dumb. In fact, most contribute to the fight against the creatures, and all appear to be thinking.



The principal characters, Earl and Val, are rough, sometimes crude, men, but decent, and –albeit reluctantly - willing to put themselves in danger to help others. The importance of likeable characters is sometimes overlooked by writers; if the viewer doesn’t care about the main personalities in a plot, care about the plot – and the movie itself – diminishes.


The script here is also funny, providing plenty of humour, especially in the characters of a couple of survivalists (Michael Gross, Reba McEntire), and in the interaction of Val and Earl. Significantly, the humour never descends to self-satire, and is perfectly reasonable within the context of the story. A smug, knowing deprecation on the part of the film would have been deadly.


The acting is very good, especially among the leads. The cast is small, as befits a film that is almost, and ironically, claustrophobic, despite being set in the wide open Nevada desert. This was director Underwood’s first feature film, though you wouldn’t think so; he handles every shot well. Something to be appreciated was the placement of almost all the action in daylight, so the fight against the creatures – and the creatures themselves – may be seen.


In many ways, Tremors may be paired with The Thing from Another World (1951), another smart, funny, fun and well-written monster movie, also set in an isolated community. There may be a few others that were produced between the two, but it is a sad commentary that such enjoyable films appear to come along only once every forty years or so. On the other hand, that means we may be soon due for another.

7 comments:

  1. I must confess, l found this film a complete and
    utter bore..I remember sitting/struggling through
    it..just the once..! :(.
    The Thing From Another World..l found much better,
    and bearable..but the best film from 1951..was...
    The Day the Earth Stood Still..(a.k.a. Farewell to
    the Master and Journey to the World)..a classic with
    Michael Rennie..! It was remade in 2008..as with all
    remakes..it was terrible..! :(.
    Why they can't leave old movies alone..move on and make
    'new' ones..let us enjoy the old movies as classics...! :0).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Monster movies aren't usually my thing, but I really enjoyed this one!

    As a side note, I applaud what you said about the need to have at least one likable character. One of my chief gripes about movies and TV nowadays is that a good part of the time, all the characters are impossible to like, depressingly dysfunctional, or downright loathsome. I just can't watch "entertainment" like that. There seems to be the feeling that writing can't be "good" unless it's unrelentingly grim or charmless.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There appear to be a number of recent television series centred around unpleasant or criminal main characters. These are more reasons why I don't watch tv anymore.

      Delete
  3. I'm not a fan of monster movies, but your review would suggest I might even enjoy this one. Once things settle down around here I plan to explore the options available at my local library, including programming, movies as well as books. Will add this to the list!

    ReplyDelete
  4. This movie is on my list of 'watch it whenever it's on TV'! There are some good and bad parts, but I love when the monster busts into the 'bunker' and instead of freaking out and running for the hills, they blast away! I've never watched any of the other Tremors movies, of which there were two or three...I think.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, that's a priceless scene. As for sequels, unless they are planned at the time of the original, or (in very rare cases) as good as the original, I tend to stay away from them.

      Delete
  5. I saw this way back when and did not think it rose on the Science Fiction bar as "The Thing from another World" which is a classic.

    ReplyDelete